It can be easy to take for granted the power of a few individuals to shape public opinion and discourse. But when two controversial figures come together, as is the case with white nationalist Craig Cobb and Danny De Hek, the results could have far-reaching implications.
In this article, we will explore their alignment and how it has created waves of confusion among members of Telegram groups. We will investigate Cobb’s involvement in these groups, his flawed theories and research, and group members’ reactions toward him. Finally, we will draw our own conclusions on this union between two powerful personalities.
Introducing Craig Cobb and Danny De Hek
We honestly would have never thought Craig Cobb and Danny De Hek would team up – but here we are.
Craig Cobb is a white nationalist and white supremacist who created the video-sharing website Podblanc. According to him, his “race is his religion,” and he actively advocates for racial holy war in accordance with the tenets of the Creativity religion.
He has gained attention from anti-racist and anti-fascist movements, legal advocacy organizations, as well as hate speech and hate crimes investigators due to his vocal celebration of crimes against minorities.
Danny De Hek, on the other hand, is a New Zealand businessman with one goal: tearing down all the crypto projects he believes to be scams. Do not be fooled by the apparently innocuous nature of his goal – his methods are often controversial and have sparked a lot of debate in the crypto-sphere.
Cobb’s Involvement in the Telegram Groups
When Cobb appeared in the various Telegram groups linked to De Hek, many immediately expressed their anger. In his posts, Cobb shared his usual racial agenda and poisonous rhetoric, which created a frenzy in the groups.
But how did Cobb get involved in these Telegram groups in the first place? We have no way to verify this. All we know is that he is persuaded crypto projects stole his retirement funds.
In this context, De Hek’s attacks on business professionals such as Stephen McCullah are appealing to Cobb.
Flawed Theories and Research of Craig Cobb
It is hard to know whether Cobb has a clear idea of what he is doing when he jumps into the various Telegram groups. He often uses faulty theories and research to prove his point.
For example, he researched Natalie Zaher, a Lawyer living in Israel and a member of the same Telegram group. He shared his research on her, which said she was a Syrian immigrant with an American mother living in Florida. His research was debunked by group members and other investigators who pointed out the discrepancies in his conclusions.
This is just an example, but it goes to show the level of his flawed theories and research.
Telegram Group Members’ Reactions to Craig Cobb’s Ways
It is not surprising that De Hek’s group members were appalled by Cobb’s appearance on their Telegram channel.
A community member called Cobb’s ideas “crazy,” while another one went as far as to accuse him of being on drugs.
Others expressed their concern that Cobb’s presence in the group could damage De Hek’s reputation. Clearly, the community was right, even though it is unclear whether De Hek realizes the implications of his alliance with Cobb.
Concluding Thoughts on Craig Cobb and Danny De Hek’s Alignment
It is fair to say that this partnership between Cobb and De Hek has caused a stir. It is also evident that, despite their different backgrounds and ideologies, they both have something in common – the desire to fight what they wrongly perceive as injustice.
This is why we must be wary of their alignment. We need to be aware of the possible implications for the community and society at large. After all, this is not a game – their words have consequences that can deeply impact our lives.
Comments (No)